Next week million of children once again go to school. For some it is an exciting time. Time to see your friends, make new ones, learn new skills. For others it is just the same old same old. They are marking time until they can be free! And for some it is a dreaded nightmare. A place of bullying, judgement, and fear. Sometimes we, as a society, just say it is all part of growing up. That's what they used to say about getting drunk at a party and jamming kids into a car for a wild ride. We don't call that part of growing up anymore. An education which instills fear, dislike, or boredom should not be part of growing up either. Education should give our children skills, knowledge, and above all, a love of learning. If this isn't happening for your child, there are things that you can do.
The first question that all parents, and older students, need to ask themselves is : What is the purpose of education? This is neither easy nor obvious and there are many different answers. Some say that education is to prepare them for life. What does that mean? Teaching them accounting skills, how to get a job, time management, practical skills? Or does it mean teaching them cooperation, teamwork, problem solving, people skills? Or critical thinking, rational deduction, communication skills? There are a lot of options. Perhaps education is to show them how to follow their passion. To develop that passion into a marketable skill. Or perhaps the end goal is to learn how to learn so that education is a lifelong experience. My point here is that there are many different purposes and they are all right. You have to decide which one is right for your child.
After you have sorted out that, you need to figure out what the school's purpose is. Do they have the same goal in mind that you do? You need to know if you are both journeying to the same destination. If you are not, then you need to supplement your child's education with the pieces that the local school does not offer. One example which comes up all the time is in high school. Parents have decided that they want their child to go to university. They assume that somehow the school knows this. They think that the school advisors will counsel their child into the best courses for going to university. However the school counsellors actually have a different goal. Their goal is to have all the students complete high school. Therefore they may select courses which suit their goal and not yours.
First and foremost you must be an advocate for your child. You must work with the school to achieve the end that you want. Do not assume that they know what that is or, if they do, that they can accommodate you. After all, they have thousands of students, each with their own goals. It is essential that you work with the school, the administrators, and the teachers. An antagonistic relationship will never work. Your child will lose respect for the school and for education in general. If you absolutely cannot work with a particular school or system then, for the sake of your child, you must change to another one. How can you teach your child to respect teachers if you do not?
This is one important step to helping your child have the best school year ever. School should be a place of excitement and passion for learning. And it can be. If you are interested in more personal advice for your particular situation, send me a comment and I will respond privately.
Happy Schooling!
Education through Art!
Tuesday, 28 August 2012
Thursday, 16 August 2012
They all work...or not.
New math, unschooling, whole language, Waldorf, flipping school, Montessori... the list of educational methods is very long and constantly being amended. And they all work - for some children And none work for all children. We want all children to have an equal opportunity to get a good education and that translates into each child receiving the same education. This is a fallacy that we have been dealing with at least since the advent of women's liberation. We confuse "equal" with "same".
We do not need educational experts to tell us what any parent of more than one child can tell us. What works for one does not work for all. We need to stop focusing on teaching the curriculum and start focusing on teaching the child. The focus of public schooling is how to process the largest number of children in the most efficient way with the best use of resources. Sounds like a valid business principle. Except that children are not products that can be assembled on a line. And we don't really want what that line would produce, unless we are Orwellian in our social principles. We want children to become the best that they individually can become. We want them to be passionate about what they do. We want them to be successful. We want them to be productive. We want them to be happy.
All of which relies on nurturing them in their own unique ways. To letting them flourish and grow within the context of their passions, abilities, and goals. The "best" method for that is to educate the child. Sounds simple and yet rarely happens, despite the best efforts of many good teachers. The system keeps mandating "best practices", computer generated tests and assessments, criteria that have nothing to do with what is best for the child, or even for society.
Let teachers teach. Give them the latest research and let them decide how best to apply it. Use some common sense is assessing whether a child is flourishing. Listen to parents and employers when they complain about the fact that today's students are completely unprepared for life. Those in charge of administering the enormous education system need to start listening. High school should not be something that you suffer through. It should not just be a place to make friends and learn social skills. It should be a place of learning and a place where they learn that learning is powerful, engaging, important, and wonderful. A lesson for all times.
We do not need educational experts to tell us what any parent of more than one child can tell us. What works for one does not work for all. We need to stop focusing on teaching the curriculum and start focusing on teaching the child. The focus of public schooling is how to process the largest number of children in the most efficient way with the best use of resources. Sounds like a valid business principle. Except that children are not products that can be assembled on a line. And we don't really want what that line would produce, unless we are Orwellian in our social principles. We want children to become the best that they individually can become. We want them to be passionate about what they do. We want them to be successful. We want them to be productive. We want them to be happy.
All of which relies on nurturing them in their own unique ways. To letting them flourish and grow within the context of their passions, abilities, and goals. The "best" method for that is to educate the child. Sounds simple and yet rarely happens, despite the best efforts of many good teachers. The system keeps mandating "best practices", computer generated tests and assessments, criteria that have nothing to do with what is best for the child, or even for society.
Let teachers teach. Give them the latest research and let them decide how best to apply it. Use some common sense is assessing whether a child is flourishing. Listen to parents and employers when they complain about the fact that today's students are completely unprepared for life. Those in charge of administering the enormous education system need to start listening. High school should not be something that you suffer through. It should not just be a place to make friends and learn social skills. It should be a place of learning and a place where they learn that learning is powerful, engaging, important, and wonderful. A lesson for all times.
Sunday, 29 July 2012
Education Through Art
Education Through Art
Education through Art, sounds
impressive but what does it mean? What is Art? Painting, dancing,
music. These are the Arts. But what is Art? Art is creativity,
imagination, something from nothing, of no practical value - these
are many other definitions. But more than all of these, Art is the
passion. Art is the soul of the machine.
Long ago Western man decided to
understand things by taking them apart. If you could grasp the
function of each of the pieces then you would understand the whole.
Body became separated from Mind. Physical from Mental. Reason from
Faith. Practical from Artistic. For generations in sciences,
philosophy, and education, we have analyzed and struggled to
understand what makes us work, as individuals, as societies, and as a
species. The problem lies in that only some parts are reducible to
components. So we studied those parts, the body, the physical world,
reasoning patterns, practical applications. And we learned how to
pass these on to our children. Through formal education.
For the rest, the intangible, the soul,
spirit, or whatever term you choose, we left that to the spiritual
leaders, to traditions, to culture. And as a species we have been
doing okay. Except recently. Now we have a breakdown of these
support networks. Most families no longer have a spiritual
counselor. Many have left traditions and family networks far behind
in our global wanderings. So we look to our source of learning. We
look to our scientists and our educators. And we ask them to take
care of our children. To find the best practices for teaching. And
they do their best. They use the system that they have always used.
They emphasize the practical, the applicable, the concrete. Our
children learn to use machines. They explore the world through their
fingertips and electronic impulses which bring everything they need
to them. The world is on the screen before them and they are all
knowing.
No, they aren't. They don't know this
information; they merely have access to it. In order to learn
children must have the skills to learn. They must know how to think
and use their minds in multitudinous ways. To see things from
different perspectives. To imagine that which they cannot see or
access. To stretch themselves. But teachers cannot help them to do
that if they do not want to learn. We call them "reluctant
learners" and they are a growing epidemic.
But all children learn all the time.
They can't help it. It is basic instinct founded on survival skills.
Knowledge keeps you alive and allows you to flourish. So what are
they reluctant to learn? The very things that the scientists and
educators keep telling them they need to know. They are reluctant
because they are not engaged. There is no passion in their learning.
What is Art? Art is passion. Art is
the realm of engagement. When you educate through art you inspire
the spirit to crave the knowledge. A chemical reaction becomes a
dance. A math theory becomes a thing of structure and beauty. A
history lesson comes alive through the full experience of empathy.
The children dream of gladiators. They wince at slavery as they
read, write, draw, perform. They engage with the information and
then they know it. Their passions are ignited and they are inspired
and they learn.
Education Through Art.
Sunday, 15 July 2012
Vision or insanity?
One man's vision may be another man's insanity. Recently I finished Irving Stone's biography of Vincent Van Gogh, Lust for Life. I also saw "Secretariat", the Disney movie starring Diane Lane
and John Malkovich. Each piece speaks directly to the theme of a personal intense passion. In these two cases the passion produced a monumental masterpiece, or masterpieces. In each case we have a person obsessed with one idea and that obsession eventually leads to greatness. It is easy to see the value of following one's passion by looking at these great historic events. As they say, hindsight is 20x20.
But what about when the past was still the future? Van Gogh's family considered him a monumental failure, the son who could never hold down a job, never learn any business, kept bouncing from passion to passion. His society considered him a madman and a danger. And the other artists generally considered him to have no technique or skill. Penny Chenery, the owner of Secretariat, arguably the best race horse ever, risked the financial future of her entire family, her own children, and her marriage for the sake of an unproven colt. She was considered crazy by her brother, her husband, and most of the racing industry. History has proven them to have been right.
But what about all those passions that never worked out? Never had books written about them or movies made about them because they didn't work out? What about the Vincents and Pennys of this generation? How can you tell the difference? The truth is that you can't. The problem is not that we can't tell the difference between passion and obsessive madness. We are asking the wrong question. The question that we should be asking is - Does it matter? Van Gogh's society judged him and found him wanting. Only future generations appreciated what he did. I wonder if he had been living now if he would have ever painted what he did.
We are so quick to analyze and label that which is different. We want everyone to be happy. On the surface, a lovely sentiment, but underneath it reeks of Brave New World. Just give everyone a happiness pill and humanity is dead. Humans need to feel passion. They need to be allowed to pursue their passion no matter how crazy it may seem, no matter how little "success" they may achieve. Because success is relative. Success is socially determined and is not the same for all or for all times. Van Gogh and Chenery succeeded because they didn't care what others thought. They followed their own inner voice and they risked greatly in order to achieve greatness. They did not strive for greatness. They merely went where their passion took them. The rest followed.
(Just an aside, I, of course, am not condoning any obsessions which lead to the damage or destruction of others. That should go without saying.)
Just think carefully about the world that you want. A world of "happiness" for all or a world full of passion. And then think about our children. Do we want them to be happy or do we want them to be all they can be? Passion is not about happiness or success. Passion is about strong feelings, immense energy, and a roller coaster ride of a life. With pain, failure, stress, anger, but what a high! We would no longer need drugs or extreme adventures to feel truly alive. When you follow your passion you are complete. That is a world of which I would like to be a part.
and John Malkovich. Each piece speaks directly to the theme of a personal intense passion. In these two cases the passion produced a monumental masterpiece, or masterpieces. In each case we have a person obsessed with one idea and that obsession eventually leads to greatness. It is easy to see the value of following one's passion by looking at these great historic events. As they say, hindsight is 20x20.
But what about when the past was still the future? Van Gogh's family considered him a monumental failure, the son who could never hold down a job, never learn any business, kept bouncing from passion to passion. His society considered him a madman and a danger. And the other artists generally considered him to have no technique or skill. Penny Chenery, the owner of Secretariat, arguably the best race horse ever, risked the financial future of her entire family, her own children, and her marriage for the sake of an unproven colt. She was considered crazy by her brother, her husband, and most of the racing industry. History has proven them to have been right.
But what about all those passions that never worked out? Never had books written about them or movies made about them because they didn't work out? What about the Vincents and Pennys of this generation? How can you tell the difference? The truth is that you can't. The problem is not that we can't tell the difference between passion and obsessive madness. We are asking the wrong question. The question that we should be asking is - Does it matter? Van Gogh's society judged him and found him wanting. Only future generations appreciated what he did. I wonder if he had been living now if he would have ever painted what he did.
We are so quick to analyze and label that which is different. We want everyone to be happy. On the surface, a lovely sentiment, but underneath it reeks of Brave New World. Just give everyone a happiness pill and humanity is dead. Humans need to feel passion. They need to be allowed to pursue their passion no matter how crazy it may seem, no matter how little "success" they may achieve. Because success is relative. Success is socially determined and is not the same for all or for all times. Van Gogh and Chenery succeeded because they didn't care what others thought. They followed their own inner voice and they risked greatly in order to achieve greatness. They did not strive for greatness. They merely went where their passion took them. The rest followed.
(Just an aside, I, of course, am not condoning any obsessions which lead to the damage or destruction of others. That should go without saying.)
Just think carefully about the world that you want. A world of "happiness" for all or a world full of passion. And then think about our children. Do we want them to be happy or do we want them to be all they can be? Passion is not about happiness or success. Passion is about strong feelings, immense energy, and a roller coaster ride of a life. With pain, failure, stress, anger, but what a high! We would no longer need drugs or extreme adventures to feel truly alive. When you follow your passion you are complete. That is a world of which I would like to be a part.
Wednesday, 4 July 2012
I am a Gardener; I am an Artist
I am a Gardener. Those who know me, know that I am not a gardener of gardens. In fact, most plants seem to wither and die under my care. No, I am a gardener of children. (A Kinder Gartener!) I take whatever young growth comes to the school and nurture it. I give it the nutrients, water, soil, and sun that it needs to turn into whatever blossom it is going to be. There is a video going around Facebook and YouTube about a young man named Andrew De Leon who is exactly the kind of flower which would prosper in our school garden. He dresses like a Goth and claims to be a failure at everything and yet he has this amazing voice. Until America's Got Talent, he was treated as a weed, someone who did not fit in the ordered, one-size-fits-all society of the masses. Daily we see repressed, misfit children reveal hidden talents and amazing gifts. So I am a gardener who sees a school not as a factory, which churns out productive citizens on a fixed and rigid system, but a garden where students can grow with the support and guidance to be whatever they can be.
I am an Artist. Again, I can't draw at all, but I am a writer and I know the power of imagination. We use the student's own imagination to gently allow them to explore, in all subjects, yes, even including mathematics, outside their box. Out of their tiny, often fantasy, where they escape from the world, comfort zone. Breaking out of their shell and taking flight. Yes, I am mixing metaphors and as an English teacher I should know better. I do. But the garden analogy can only be stretched so far. Because the students may be nurtured by the concrete physical world. We give them a safe launching pad with daily doses of mental and physical exercises. But the final goal is to allow them to soar above the garden. To use their imaginations, their self-confidence to pursue their passions, with firm roots in the here and now. To dream is one thing; to realize that dream in this present world is another. It is irresponsible not to teach them the tools they need to turn that dream into a viable, financially sound reality. So we are a garden of flower birds.
I am a Teacher. I till the soil and watch them soar. I couldn't imagine a better job. This is my passion and I soar each day!
I am an Artist. Again, I can't draw at all, but I am a writer and I know the power of imagination. We use the student's own imagination to gently allow them to explore, in all subjects, yes, even including mathematics, outside their box. Out of their tiny, often fantasy, where they escape from the world, comfort zone. Breaking out of their shell and taking flight. Yes, I am mixing metaphors and as an English teacher I should know better. I do. But the garden analogy can only be stretched so far. Because the students may be nurtured by the concrete physical world. We give them a safe launching pad with daily doses of mental and physical exercises. But the final goal is to allow them to soar above the garden. To use their imaginations, their self-confidence to pursue their passions, with firm roots in the here and now. To dream is one thing; to realize that dream in this present world is another. It is irresponsible not to teach them the tools they need to turn that dream into a viable, financially sound reality. So we are a garden of flower birds.
I am a Teacher. I till the soil and watch them soar. I couldn't imagine a better job. This is my passion and I soar each day!
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
Where to Start?
Where do you start when you know something is wrong but have no idea how to fix it? That was my dilemma several years ago. I knew that there was something wrong at school with my kids. I spoke with the teachers, the principal, even the board trustee. I couldn't get any answers or even hints of a solution. The problems were numerous - bullying issues, boredom, inappropriate material, awareness on my part that my children could be doing so much more. I eventually realized that the problem was not so much the individual issues but the shape and size of the box that they were in. Sometimes no matter how we try we can't fix a problem when the problem is an inherent part of the situation. To be put bluntly, the problem did not lie with the teachers, the principal, or the board. The problem was the system itself. There was a basic disconnect between how I viewed a good education and they did.
So, when the box doesn't fit, it is time to look outside the box. We hear this expression used all the time and, on some level, we understand what it means but, in another way, we often don't really go outside the box, we just look at the box from another angle. Because what is truly outside the box is the unknown and that is scary. I went outside the box to get my children the education that I wanted for them. I went way outside the box. It was hard; it took work; it was filled with uncertainty. But I discovered something along the way. Because my goal was always to have them educated in a way so that they could make responsible decisions and learn to love learning for its own sake. Because we always strove to open as many doors to their futures as possible. Because we always stay involved with their learning and growing,outside the box was just fine.
Every day I hear parents complaining about children being bored, teenagers hating school, a week spent watching movies. How serious are these failures of our education system? That is a decision to be made by each parent. But let me ask you this: if the box they are in is not working, why are they still in the box? Most importantly, why are they still in the box that failed you as a student? The most common line that I hear when giving people a tour of Mississippi School for the Arts is "Where were you when I was going to high school?" If this is the kind of school that you would have like to have attended, then why shouldn't it be a school for your children?
But even if we are willing to take ourselves into the unknown, we are very hesitant to risk our children. But we need to. If we don't then they will also live to regret that they did not have the opportunity to really learn what education could be like. As Einstein said and is oft repeated, "The surest sign of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect a different result."
So, when the box doesn't fit, it is time to look outside the box. We hear this expression used all the time and, on some level, we understand what it means but, in another way, we often don't really go outside the box, we just look at the box from another angle. Because what is truly outside the box is the unknown and that is scary. I went outside the box to get my children the education that I wanted for them. I went way outside the box. It was hard; it took work; it was filled with uncertainty. But I discovered something along the way. Because my goal was always to have them educated in a way so that they could make responsible decisions and learn to love learning for its own sake. Because we always strove to open as many doors to their futures as possible. Because we always stay involved with their learning and growing,outside the box was just fine.
Every day I hear parents complaining about children being bored, teenagers hating school, a week spent watching movies. How serious are these failures of our education system? That is a decision to be made by each parent. But let me ask you this: if the box they are in is not working, why are they still in the box? Most importantly, why are they still in the box that failed you as a student? The most common line that I hear when giving people a tour of Mississippi School for the Arts is "Where were you when I was going to high school?" If this is the kind of school that you would have like to have attended, then why shouldn't it be a school for your children?
But even if we are willing to take ourselves into the unknown, we are very hesitant to risk our children. But we need to. If we don't then they will also live to regret that they did not have the opportunity to really learn what education could be like. As Einstein said and is oft repeated, "The surest sign of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect a different result."
Sunday, 6 May 2012
A Bit of Silliness (Is Good for the Soul)
Cody and Jody
Cody and Jody live in a magical house
Not quite like any other place
With toys all around
Six feet deep on the ground
And not one inch of spare space.
Their mother just stands there
Shakes her head at the mess
"Wasn't me," insists Cody.
"Wasn't me," insists Jody.
Who'll clean up the mess? Can you
guess?
Jody and Cody have a miraculous place
Where the books leap down from the
shelves
They fall and they scatter
Like any old matter
And they do it all by themselves.
Their father just stands there
Shakes his head at the mess
"Wasn't me," giggles Cody.
"Wasn't me," giggles Jody.
Who'll clean up the mess? Can you
guess?
Cody and Jody have a peculiar spot
Where the trucks move all on their own
Roaring and crashing
Leaping and smashing
In a ear-crashing demolition zone.
Their grandmother just stands there
Shakes her head at the mess
"Wasn't me," shrieks Cody.
"Wasn't me," shrieks Jody.
Who'll clean up the mess? Can you
guess?
Jody and Cody have a mysterious room
Where the clothes are fast disappearing
The pants on the stairs
Where's the underwear?
In the kitchen it just keeps appearing.
Their grandfather just stands there
Shakes his head at the mess
"Wasn't me," whispers Cody.
"Wasn't me," whispers Jody.
Who'll clean up the mess? Can you
guess?
Cody and Jody live in an unusual land
Where the sheets are ajumble all day
Beds made in the morning
In a sudden, without warning
Bunch and scrunch up any old way.
Their parents just stand there
Shake their heads at the mess
"Wasn't me," laughs Cody.
"Wasn't me," laughs Jody.
Who'll clean up the mess? Can you
guess?
Jody and Cody live in a wonderful house
Not like anywhere else in the world
While everyone's sleeping
"Wasn't Me" is a-sweeping
A-cleaning, a-sorting all unheard.
The grown-ups just stand there
Smile their smiles at no mess
"A new day," smiles Cody.
"Let's go play," smiles Jody.
Who'll clean up the mess? Can you
guess?
Copyright 2001 S.L. Holzscherer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)